Incontinence After Prostatectomy: Coping With Incontinence After Prostate Cancer Surgery

Mary H. Palmer

Linda A. Fogarty

Mark R. Somerfield

Lorrie L. Powel

ONF 2003, 30(2), 229-238. DOI: 10.1188/03.ONF.229-238

Purpose/Objectives: To describe the nature of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence, determine how men manage postsurgery urinary incontinence, identify men's perceptions of adequacy of preoperative counseling, and identify men's expectations regarding the probability of postsurgery incontinence.

Design: Survey.

Setting: United States.

Sample: Members of US TOO International, who experienced urinary incontinence after surgery.

Methods: Copies of the survey (N = 370) were mailed to all chapters of US TOO International, a prostate cancer support group, for distribution to members. A letter of invitation also was posted on the US TOO International Web site and in the monthly newsletter. Men who desired to complete the survey (N = 130) called the researcher's office, and a copy of the survey and a stamped return envelope was mailed to them. Surveys returned to the researchers from June 1998 to January 1999 were included in the analyses.

Main Research Variables: Urinary incontinence, management of urinary incontinence, and coping.

Findings: 166 men returned surveys. The majority was Caucasian (95%) and married (83%). The median age was 67 years, 87% of the men rated their health as good or excellent, and 114 men (69%) reported becoming incontinent after surgery. Most men experienced stress incontinence symptoms. The majority (89 of 111 men) reported that they were told preoperatively that urinary incontinence was a possible complication. Overall, regardless of length of time since surgery, men (74%) thought that incontinence was an important problem to resolve. Men used containment devices such as pads, special undergarments, and even sanitary napkins as management strategies. The majority of men (54%) used pelvic muscle exercises, especially those who were fewer than two years postsurgery (72%).

Conclusions: Urinary incontinence is a prevalent postoperative complication for men, even up to five years after surgery, and a source of great distress for some. Men reported stress and urge incontinence symptoms and used an array of strategies to contain their urine. Finding effective treatments for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence and receiving adequate information before surgery is important to these men.

Implications for Nursing: As the number of men who undergo surgical treatment for prostate cancer increases, nurses need to be equipped with the necessary knowledge and information to answer preoperative concerns and provide effective strategies for managing postoperative urinary incontinence.

Jump to a section

    References

    Catalona, W.J., Carvalhal, G.F., Mager, D.E., & Smith, D.S. (1999). Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. Journal of Urology, 162, 433-438.

    Fantl, J.A., Newman, D.K., Colling, J., DeLancey, J.O., Keeys, C., Loughery, R., et al. (1996). Urinary incontinence in adults: Acute and chronic management [AHCPR Publication No. 96-0682]. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Feneley, M., & Partin, A. (2000). Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: 10 years of progress. Current Opinions in Urology, 10, 319-327.

    Fitch, M.I., Gray, R., Franssen, E., & Johnson, B. (2000). Men's perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: Implications for oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27, 1255-1263.

    Fonda, D. (1990). Improving management of urinary incontinence in geriatric centres and nursing homes. Australia Clinical Review, 22, 140-144.

    Gerber, G., Thisted, R., Scardino, P., Frohmuller, H., Schroeder, F., Paulson, D., et al. (1996). Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 276, 615-619.

    Gilliland, F., Hoffman, R., Hamilton, A., Albertsen, P., Eley, J., Harlan, L., et al. (1999). Predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer in men treated with radical prostatectomy: Results from the population based prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of Urology, 162, 1359-1360.

    Groutz, A., Blaivas, J.G., Chaikin, D.C., Resnick, N.M., Engelman, K., Anzalone, D., et al. (2000). Noninvasive outcomes measures of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: A multicenter study of micturition diary and pad tests. Journal of Urology, 164, 698-701.

    Haas, G.P., & Sakr, W.A. (1997). Epidemiology of prostate cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 47, 273-287.

    John, H., Sullivan, M.P., Bangerter, U., Haun, D., & Yalla, S.V. (2000). Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission. Journal of Urology, 163, 1761-1766.

    Junemann, K.P. (1999). Editorial comment: Urodynamics after radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 35, 221-222.

    Kao, T., Cruess, D.F., Garner, D., Foley, J., Seay, T., Friedrichs, P., et al. (2000). Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology, 163, 858-864.

    Korda, M. (1996). Man to man: Surviving prostate cancer. New York: Random House.

    Moore, K.N., & Estey, A. (1999). The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 1121-1129.

    Moorhouse, D., Robinson, J., Bradway, C., Zoltick, B., & Newman, D. (2001). Behavioral treatments for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Ostomy Wound Management, 47(12), 30-42.

    Palmer, M. (2000). Postprostatecomy: The magnitude of the problem. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing, 27, 129-137.

    Palmer, M. (2002). Using epidemiology in patient education for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Ostomy Wound Management, 47(12), 20-25.

    Potter, S., & Partin, A. (2001, June). Surgical theory of clinical localized prostate cancer: Rationale, patient selection, and outcomes. Presentation atthe meeting of the First International Prostate Cancer Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

    Pound, C., Partin, A., Epstein, J. & Walsh, P. (1997). Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. Urology Clinics of North America, 24, 395-406.

    Scher, H., Isaacs, J., Fuks, Z., & Walsh, P. (1995). Prostate. In M. Abeloff, J. Armitage, A. Licther, & J. Niederhuber (Eds.). Clinical oncology (pp. 1439-1492). New York: Churchill-Livingstone.

    Walsh, P.C., Marschke, P., Ricker, D., & Burnett, A.L. (2000). Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology, 55, 58-61.

    Wei, J.T., & Montie, J.E. (2000). Comparison of patients' and physicians' ratings of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Seminars in Urologic Oncology, 18, 76-80.

    Winters, J.C., Appell, R.A., & Rackley, R.R. (1998). Urodynamic findings in postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurology and Urodynamics, 17, 493-498.

    Wyman, J., Harkins, S., Choi, S., Taylor, J., & Fantl, A. (1987). Pyschosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 70, 278-381.