Provision of Individualized Information to Men and Their Partners to Facilitate Treatment Decision Making in Prostate Cancer
Purpose/Objectives: To determine if providing individualized information to men who are newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners would lower their levels of psychological distress and enable them to become more active participants in treatment decision making.
Design: Quasiexperimental, one group, pretest/post-test.
Setting: The Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital in British Columbia, Canada.
Sample: Convenience sample of 74 couples. 73 men had early-stage prostate cancer. Mean age of the men was 62.2 years, and mean age of the partners was 58.1 years. The majority (< 50%) had received their high school diplomas.
Methods: Respondents completed measures of decision preferences and psychological distress at the time of diagnosis and four months later. All participants used a computer to identify their information and decision preferences. Computer-generated, graphic printouts were used to guide the information counseling session.
Findings: Patients reported assuming a more active role in medical decision making than originally intended, partners assumed a more passive role in decision making than originally intended, and all participants had lower levels of psychological distress at four months.
Conclusions: Evidence supports the need to provide informational support to couples at the prostate cancer diagnosis to facilitate treatment decision making and lower levels of psychological distress. Future research is needed to evaluate this type of approach in the context of a randomized clinical trial design.
Implications for Nursing: The personalized, computer-graphic printouts can provide clinicians with an innovative method of guiding information counseling and providing decisional support to men with prostate cancer and their partners.
Jump to a section
References
Balder, L., Ever-Hadam, P., & De-Nour, A.K. (1995). The impact of culture on perception of patient-physician satisfaction. Israel Journal of Medical Science, 31, 179-185.
Beeber, L.S., Shea, J., & McCorkle, R. (1998). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale as a measure of depressive symptoms in newly diagnosed patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 16(1), 1-20.
Beisecker, A.E., & Moore, W.P. (1994). Oncologists' perceptions of the effects of cancer patients' companions on physician-patient interactions. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 12(1/2), 23-39.
Brawley, O.W., & Barnes, S. (2001). The epidemiology of prostate cancer in the United States. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 17, 12-11.
Cassileth, B.R., Lusk, E.J., Strouse, T.B., Miller, D.S., Brown, L.L., & Cross, P.A. (1985). A psychological analysis of cancer patients and their next-of-kin. Cancer, 55, 72-76.
Cohen, F., & Lazarus, R.D. (1979). Coping with stress of illness. In G.C. Stone, F. Cohen, & N.E. Adler, (Eds.) Health psychology (pp. 217-224). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Coombs, C.H. (1976). A theory of data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
Costello, D., & Kiernan, M. (1993). Patients with radical prostatectomy: Postdischarge telephone calls. Urologic Nursing, 13(2), 55-57.
Davison, B.J., & Degner, L.F. (1997). Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nursing, 20, 187-196.
Davison, B.J., Degner, L.F., & Morgan, T.R. (1995). Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 22, 1401-1408.
Davison, B.J., Gleave, M.E., Goldenberg, S.L., Degner, L.F., Hoffart, D., & Berkowitz, J. (2002). Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nursing, 25, 42-49.
Davison, B.J., Kirk, P., Degner, L.F., & Hassard, T.H. (1999). Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 37, 255-263.
Degner, L.F., & Sloan, J.A. (1992). Decision-making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 941-950.
Degner, L.F., Sloan, J.A., & Venkatesh, P. (1997). The control preferences scale. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 21-43.
Edlund, B., & Sneed, N.V. (1989). Emotional responses to the diagnosis of cancer: Age-related comparisons. Oncology Nursing Forum, 16, 691-697.
Ell, O., Nishimoto, R.H., Mantell, J.E., & Hamovitch, H.B. (1988). Psychological adaptation to cancer: A comparison among patients, spouses, and non-spouses. Family Systems Medicine, 6, 335-348.
Heyman, E.N., & Rosner, T.T. (1996). Prostate cancer: An intimate view from patients and wives. Urologic Nursing, 16(2), 37-44.
Jemal, A., Thomas, A., Murray, T., & Thun, M. (2002). Cancer statistics 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52, 23-47.
Kornblith, A.B., Herr, H.W., Ofman, U.S., Scher, H.I., & Holland, J.C. (1994). Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: The value of a database in clinical care. Cancer, 73, 2791-2802.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Mclver, J.P., & Carmines, E.G. (1991). Unidimensional scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McPherson, C.P., Swenson, K.K., & Kjellberg, J. (2001). Quality of life in patients with prostate cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 17, 138-146.
Moore, K.N., & Estey, A. (1999). The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 1121-1129.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (2002). Canadian cancer statistics 2002. Toronto, Canada: Author.
Northouse, L.L., & Peters-Golden, H. (1993). Cancer and the family: Strategies to assist spouses. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 9, 74-82.
Oberst, M.T., & James, R.H. (1985). Going home: Patient and spouse adjustment following cancer surgery. Topics in Clinical Nursing, 7(1), 46-57.
Oberst, M.T., & Scott, D.W. (1988). Post-discharge distress in surgically treated cancer patients and their spouses. Research in Nursing and Health, 11, 223-233.
Onel, E., Hamond, C., Wasson, J.H., Berlin, B.B., Ely, M.G., Laudone, V.P., et al. (1998). Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer. Urology, 51, 63-66.
O'Rourke, M.E. (1997). Prostate cancer treatment selection: The family decision process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
O'Rourke, M.E. (1999). Narrowing the options: The process of deciding on prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Investigation, 17, 349-359.
O'Rourke, M.E. (2001). Decision making and prostate cancer treatment selection: A review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 17, 108-117.
O'Rourke, M.E., & Germino, B.B. (1998). Prostate cancer treatment decisions: A focus group exploration. Oncology Nursing Forum, 25, 97-104.
Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Ross, R.T. (1974). Optimal orders in the method of paired comparisons. In G. M. Maranell (Ed.), Scaling: A sourcebook for behavioral scientists (pp. 106-109). Chicago: Aldine.
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.L. (1970). STA manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Steginga, S.K., Occhipinti, S., Dunn, J., Gardiner, R.A., Heathcote, P., & Yaxley, J. (2001). The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000). Psycho-Oncology, 10, 66-75.
Thurstone, L.L. (1974). A law of comparative judgment. In G.M. Maranell (Ed.), Scaling: A sourcebook for behavioral scientists (pp. 81-92). Chicago: Aldine.
Wong, F., Stewart, D.E., Dancey, J., Meana, M., McAndrews, M.P., Bunston, T., et al. (2000). Men with prostate cancer: Influence of psychological factors on informational needs and decision making. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 49, 13-19.