Methods & Meanings

Systematic Reviews

Kerry A. Milner

systematic review
ONF 2015, 42(1), 89-93. DOI: 10.1188/15.ONF.89-93

Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence from several studies on the same topic (Grant & Booth, 2009). The precise and systematic method differentiates systematic reviews from traditional reviews (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, & Antes, 2003). In all types of systematic reviews, a quality assessment is done of the individual studies that meet inclusion criteria. These individual assessments are synthesized, and aggregated results are reported. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence in evidence-based health care because the reviewers strive to use transparent, rigorous methods that minimize bias.

Jump to a section

    References

    Dettori, J. R. (2011). Loss to follow-up. Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal, 2, 7-10. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1267080
    DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G. H., & Ciliska, D. (2005). Evidence based nursing: A guide to clinical practice. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
    Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types a.nd associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
    Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 5.1.0). Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org
    Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 118-121. doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118
    Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., & Moher, D. (2012). Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1, 10. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-10
    MacLehose, H., & Hilton, J. (2013). Changes to the Cochrane Library during the Cochrane Collaboration's first 20 years. Retrieved from http://thecochranelibrary.com/details/editorial/4282481/Changes-to-The-Cochrane-Library-during-The-Cochrane-Collaborations-first-20-year.html
    McCormack, L., Sheridan, S., Lewis, M., Boudewyns, V., Melvin, C. L., Kistler, C., … Lohr, K. N. (2013). Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Retrieved from http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179104
    Oermann, M. H., Floyd, J. A., Galvin, E. A., & Roop, J. C. (2006). Brief reports for disseminating systematic reviews to nurses. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 20, 233-238. doi:10.1097/00002800-200609000-00009
    Straus, S., & Moher, D. (2010). Registering systematic reviews. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182, 13-14. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081849
    Tunis, A. S., McInnes, M. D., Hanna, R., & Esmail, K. (2013). Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Radiology, 269, 413-426. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130273